Putting aside for a moment that anything you want to call a pea can be one, in my opinion, it's two possibles and one negative out of the last three for OIII "Peas".
diaswa's purple candidate is an AGN (active galactic nucleus), because it shows the flat line with sharp peaks, but the OII peak is higher than the OIII, and the H-alpha perhaps too tall. The H-peaks seem to be higher in "Peas" nearer to us, though, so that's less significant probably. The OII/OIII ratio in this case does not 100% rule out that it might appear green at a higher redshift owing to the recent green one that has a reversed OII/OIII ratio from the rest. Still, this one is likely a 'no'.
Galaxy Hunters Inc, the ID number is scrambled for the first one, but it's pea-like so far. I wonder if the chart isn't being affected by the overlapping orange galaxy. Care to give it a third try?
[Edit: Found it by searching by "ra, dec".
http://cas.sdss.org/astro/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=587741490355372344 The target is actually the orange galaxy, not the green part, which has no ID. I think the chart may be a bit from both; it's not what you'd expect of a "normal" galaxy, but it's not nearly as flat as the usual "Pea" at that redshift. Hmmm. Just by the color, I do think it's a good one.
But, still could be an artifact or asteroid....]
The last pair actually both have spectral charts. The one for the upper or northern galaxy is similar but with a very short OIII peak. At their redshift, pink is appropriate for OIII "Peas", but it seems from what I know so far that at a greater 'z', the bottom one might be bright green to us while the top one might be some other color or not visible at all. That said, for the chart posted above, the baseline is riding rather high even though it's flat and the H-alpha peak (far right) is a bit tall. Definitely maybe.
